Factory automation and equipment integration
We connect data from PLCs, sensors and existing equipment to improve visibility and reduce staffing requirements.
Rather than adding equipment, cameras, PLCs and robots as isolated improvements, we start with automation and physical AI that can be tested in your current process. The aim is to reduce inspection workloads and stabilize operations, not simply to create a demo environment.
We connect inspection, robots and existing equipment data to reduce staffing requirements and missed defects together. Our aim is not to create a demo environment. We examine where people are held up in the process before defining what to connect.
We connect data from PLCs, sensors and existing equipment to improve visibility and reduce staffing requirements.
AI cameras detect defects to reduce inspection workloads and missed defects.
We support robot-arm installation, control and integration with peripheral equipment.
We distinguish between measures that help current lines, such as visual inspection and digital kanban, and future implementations such as digital twins and humanoid robots.
We do not ask you to make investment decisions from concept diagrams alone. We assess accuracy and operational workload with real data and equipment, then implement the solution, including safety and peripheral equipment integration.
We review processes, equipment and constraints to identify what can be automated.
We define the combination of cameras, robots, PLCs and existing equipment.
We assess accuracy and operational workload with real data or equipment to inform your implementation decision.
We implement the solution, including peripheral equipment, safety and connections to existing systems.
We adjust the solution to how your teams work, helping stabilize inspection and operations.
We continue supporting process changes and subsequent automation initiatives.
We first define the process to automate, the scope of equipment connections, and the conditions to test. The proof-of-concept results help distinguish what can proceed to production from what needs further validation.
We define the roles of cameras, robots, PLCs, sensors, and existing equipment. We specify the data and signal connections and determine the scope of mechanical, electrical, and software implementation.
We define checks for each process, such as distinguishing acceptable and defective products in inspection or measuring robot cycle time. We use actual data or equipment to test whether the proposed approach can meet site requirements.
We review how people move through the work area, equipment stop conditions, and signal coordination with surrounding equipment. We define production operations, including the effort required for operator checks and recovery.
You can consult us before the scope is fully defined. We use the process information available to identify what to investigate during the site review or proof of concept.
We review the process flow, equipment and PLC specifications, layout, and available signal connections. We also ask about requirements for retaining current equipment and its relationship with adjacent processes.
We review materials such as photos of inspection targets, examples of acceptable and defective products, parts to be handled, and sensor data. We discuss which materials are needed and what can be shared for each project.
We ask about process cycle times, production volumes, available equipment downtime, and tasks that involve people. The conditions for testing on site determine the validation method and deployment approach.
We consider approaches for current processes, such as equipment and PLC connections, visual inspection, and digital kanban. We agree on the implementation scope after reviewing site conditions and proof-of-concept results.
For humanoid robots and physical AI, we start with research or a proof of concept. We assess the required actions, accuracy, safety, and operating conditions to determine whether deployment on site is feasible.